Print This Article

On June 5, 2025, the US Supreme Court decided Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, which ended a circuit split on whether the background circumstances test was required to succeed on a discrimination claim brought by a member of a majority group, holding that it was not.

In Ames, the claimant alleged discrimination based on her heterosexual sexual orientation status, which placed her in the majority group. Specifically, she claimed that she was passed over for promotion in favor of a lesser-qualified homosexual applicant and later was demoted by a manager who likewise was gay. In the Sixth Circuit, the Court granted summary judgment for the Department of Youth Services, stating Ames failed to meet her prima facie burden because she did not meet the heightened evidentiary standard of the background circumstances test required of members of a majority class who bring discrimination claims. The test required her to overcome the assumption that the typical employer does not discriminate against the majority. The Sixth Circuit explained that Ames could have satisfied the heightened burden by presenting “evidence that a member of the relevant minority group made the employment decision at issue, or with statistical evidence showing a pattern of discrimination…against members of the majority group.” The case was then appealed to the US Supreme Court, who looked to the plain language of Title VII, holding that it made no distinction between majority-group claimants and minority-group claimants, and therefore, no distinction between discrimination against the majority (“reverse-discrimination”) or discrimination against the minority (“discrimination”). Clearly stated, discrimination is discrimination under Title VII. Further, they held that the imposition of an additional test is against the intent of Title VII as well as judicial efficiencies.

In practice, this ruling makes it easier for majority groups to bring and succeed on discrimination claims in all circuits and could instigate an influx of discrimination claims brought by majority-group workers. Considering all workers fall into one or more protected classes under Title VII, employers must carefully review how their policies and practices affect not only minority workers, but majority workers as well.

If you have any questions about your coverage or are interested in coverage, please contact your Aon broker.


About Aon

Aon (NYSE: AON) exists to shape decisions for the better — to protect and enrich the lives of people around the world. Through actionable analytic insight, globally integrated Risk Capital and Human Capital expertise, and locally relevant solutions, our colleagues provide clients in over 120 countries with the clarity and confidence to make better risk and people decisions that help protect and grow their businesses.

Follow Aon on LinkedIn, X, Facebook and Instagram. Stay up-to-date by visiting Aon’s newsroom and sign up for news alerts here.

©2025 Aon plc. All rights reserved.

Aon is not a law firm or accounting firm and does not provide legal, financial or tax advice. Any commentary provided is based solely on Aon’s experience as insurance practitioners. We recommend that you consult with your own legal, financial and/or insurance advisors on any commentary provided herein. All descriptions, summaries or highlights of coverage described herein are for general informational purposes only and do not amend, alter or modify the actual terms and conditions of any relevant policy. Coverage is governed only by the terms and conditions of such policy. Insurance coverage in any particular case will depend upon the type of policy in effect, the terms, conditions and exclusions in any such policy, and the facts of each unique situation. No representation is made that any specific insurance coverage would apply in the circumstances outlined herein. Please refer to the individual policy forms for specific coverage details.

The information contained in this document and the statements expressed are of a general nature and are not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity.

This document is not intended to address any specific situation or to provide legal, regulatory, financial, or other advice. While care has been taken in the production of this document, Aon does not warrant, represent or guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or fitness for any purpose of the document or any part of it and can accept no liability for any loss incurred in any way by any person who may rely on it. Any recipient shall be responsible for the use to which it puts this document. This document has been compiled using information available to us up to its date of publication and is subject to any qualifications made in the document.

Insurance products and services offered by Aon Risk Insurance Services West, Inc., Aon Risk Services Central, Inc., Aon Risk Services Northeast, Inc., Aon Risk Services Southwest, Inc., and Aon Risk Services, Inc. of Florida and their licensed affiliates.