Cost Crisis or Business as Usual? Employer Responses to Soaring Healthcare Costs

Cost Crisis or Business as Usual? Employer Responses to Soaring Healthcare Costs
January 21, 2026 7 mins

Cost Crisis or Business as Usual? Employer Responses to Soaring Healthcare Costs

Employer Strategies for Rising Healthcare Costs

Aon's Annual Health Survey reveals a critical trend: with healthcare costs accelerating at the fastest pace in a decade, more organizations are making bold benefits decisions to maintain affordability and sustainability.

Key Takeaways
  1. Healthcare cost pressures are intensifying and expected to continue: Employers can no longer rely on incremental changes alone. The pace of cost increases is forcing a re-examination of traditional strategies.
  2. Employers are divided in their readiness to take bold action: while nearly one-third of survey respondents are already making significant changes, the remaining two-thirds are waiting for a higher cost threshold or remain uncertain about when to act.
  3. Be ready for bold moves: Some employers are already taking aggressive steps. Those who wait may find themselves playing catch-up.

Consistent Priorities, New Pressures: The 2026 Benefits Agenda 

Despite the shifting environment, the top five benefits priorities for employers have stayed consistent from 2024 to 2026. Here’s what’s driving decisions this year:  

Top 5 Benefits Priorities for 2026 

Based on % of employers ranking as a top 3 priority 

  1. Manage healthcare cost and trend 
  2. Invest in supporting employee health and wellbeing 
  3. Enhance benefits to improve employee attraction and retention 
  4. Improve access and affordability of healthcare for employees 
  5. Measure impact of benefits and programs to show return and/or value on investment 

Managing cost is the #1 priority for 62% of employers and a top 3 priority for 84%. This is a significant increase from 2024, when 38% of employers ranked managing cost as their #1 priority, and reflects the growing concern around healthcare cost increases.   

Employers are Divided on What to Do as Costs Rise

As healthcare costs climb to their highest levels in a decade, many employers are grappling with where the tipping point lies: the moment when incremental adjustments are no longer enough and bold action is necessary. As a result of these mounting cost pressures, benefits are drawing increased scrutiny from CFOs and CEOs, making them an even greater business imperative in today’s environment.

When asked what level of cost increase would compel them to move beyond standard measures –like plan design, contribution changes , vendor bidding and negotiations – employers fell into three distinct groups:  

  • The Early Movers: These organizations aren’t waiting for costs to climb higher. 28% say they have already reached the cost trigger to take significant steps to control spending, including some coverage restrictions, narrow networks and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) restrictions. Among the Early Movers, large employers lead the way at 37%.    
  • The Threshold Watchers: 35% of employers are keeping a close eye on cost trends and won’t make major changes until the increase surpasses a point that is higher than the 9.5% projected for 2026. 19% believe that threshold is 12% or higher. 
  • The Uncertain Majority: 30% aren’t sure what would trigger bold action, reflecting the complexity and unpredictability of today’s benefits landscape. Small employers are especially likely to fall into this category, with 36% unsure. 

The fact that 30% of employers are uncertain about when to take bolder action as costs rise is a concern. For a company with 1,000 employees, each 1% increase in healthcare costs can mean more than $100,000 in yearly expenses. Relying on trade-offs elsewhere isn’t a lasting solution, and ignoring these rising costs may lead to an even bigger financial impact over time . Alignment with organizational leadership, including the CEO and CFO, is crucial to ensure that any bold decisions made around benefits and cost management are strategically supported and effectively implemented across the organization.

Employers Favor Proven Cost-Control Strategies – For Now

For 2026, survey respondents are prioritizing familiar approaches:48% rank adjusting employee cost sharing, such as changing payroll contributions, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs, as one of their top three strategies to reduce costs in 2026.

  • 37% rank vendor optimization, focusing on better value and service by changing vendors, renegotiating terms, or consolidating vendors, as a top three approach to reducing costs in 2026.
  • 35% rank pharmacy spend management, including changing PBMs and implementing tighter controls like prior authorization, step therapy, and quality limits, as one of their top three cost-reduction strategies.
  • 34% rank adding or changing wellbeing strategies and programs, or implementing healthcare navigation solutions, as one of their top three strategies to reduce costs. 

These strategies reflect a cautious approach. Employers are leaning on proven methods rather than disruptive changes. However, as cost pressures intensify, incremental steps may not be enough, and more innovative solutions could gain traction.

Employer and Employee Cost Increases

Employer and Employee Cost Increases

Pulling the Big Levers: What Employers Will Do When Costs Demand Bold Action 

If required to make more significant changes to reduce healthcare costs employers are most likely to turn to strategies to more aggressively manage pharmacy spend and to steer plan participants to higher quality more cost-effective care.  

Pharmacy strategies include:

  • Reducing or restricting access to coverage for GLP-1s  (39% planned for 2026, 19% strongly consider)
  • Limiting or restricting access to newer high-cost pharmaceutical therapies (13% in place for 2026, 24% strongly consider) 
  • Implementing a transparent PBM program or non-traditional PBM (15% in place for 2026, 22% strongly consider) 

Strategies to steer to higher quality more cost-effective care such as significant plan design differentials or narrow networks rank second in consideration, after GLP-1 strategies.

  • 24% using these strategies today and 29% who would strongly consider
  • Requiring use of Centers of Excellence is a strategy used by 13% of employers, while 19% would strongly consider it if required to significantly reduce cost. 

Many of these strategies, such as adopting new PBM approaches, GLP-1 coverage management, and care steerage, allow employers to take incremental steps now. By implementing these approaches, organizations position themselves for greater flexibility in the future, making it easier to take more significant actions later if needed. 

Early Movers Are More Likely to Pursue Bold Healthcare Strategies Compared to Their Peers 

  Early Movers Everyone Else
Reduce coverage or restrict access to coverage for GLP-1s 48.0% 35.8%
Strong steerage to high-quality, cost-effective care through significant plan design differentials or narrow networks 39.7% 17.8%
Implement a transparent PBM program or non-traditional PBM 22.9% 11.6%
Limit or restrict access to newer high-cost pharmaceutical therapies 19.6% 10.5%
Require use of Centers of Excellence 16.8% 11.9%
Implement an alternative health plan model (e.g. Surest, Coupe, Centivo, etc.) 16.2% 5.9%
An ACA-compliant Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) plan 11.7% 6.8%
Require use of navigator for care access 10.6% 5.1%
Require use of primary care physician to coordinate care and provide referrals to specialists and other services 10.1% 6.2%

Most employers would consider more disruptive strategies only as a last resort: 

   % as last resort
Terminate existing healthcare plans and replace with fixed employer contribution toward individual market coverage 89%
Reference-based pricing plan as a full replacement to traditional health plans 75%
An ACA-compliant Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) plan 69%
Reference-based pricing plan as a separate plan option 63%
Implement an alternative health plan model (e.g. Surest, Coupe, Centivo, etc.) 49%

What’s Next?

The 2026 employer benefits landscape is defined by urgency, innovation and the need for strategic clarity. As cost pressures mount, benefits leaders must balance immediate financial realities with long-term workforce wellbeing and attraction and retention goals. The most successful organizations will be those that act decisively, measure what matters and remain agile in the face of ongoing change. 

 

General Disclaimer

This document is not intended to address any specific situation or to provide legal, regulatory, financial, or other advice. While care has been taken in the production of this document, Aon does not warrant, represent or guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or fitness for any purpose of the document or any part of it and can accept no liability for any loss incurred in any way by any person who may rely on it. Any recipient shall be responsible for the use to which it puts this document. This document has been compiled using information available to us up to its date of publication and is subject to any qualifications made in the document.

Terms of Use

The contents herein may not be reproduced, reused, reprinted or redistributed without the expressed written consent of Aon, unless otherwise authorized by Aon. To use information contained herein, please write to our team.

More Like This

View All
Subscribe CTA Banner