What are the potential options and what are the risks for universities and students?
With the federal government pulling back on funding, many students are left with the following choices: choose not to attend graduate school, seek a less expensive graduate program, or seek alternative funding.
Universities will be impacted no matter which of these paths the prospective students select. It is relatively easy for a university to quantify impact from the loss of students; student decline leads to lost revenue not only in tuition, but also in room and board and other activities a student may engage in on campus. Furthermore, the student, upon graduation, can be an important source of potential donations as an alum as well as serving as an ambassador for the future student body. Less easy to quantify is the impact on the school’s reputation.
Thus, it is vital to help students identify other sources of funding. We are beginning to see alternative student financing programs emerge, both initiated by some elite universities as well as financial institutions. For instance, Sallie Mae and KKR have launched a strategic partnership whereby Sallie Mae is servicing loans KKR is purchasing.5,6 Santa Clara Law launched “PLEDGE Scholarship” for Fall 2026 incoming students. The scholarship program is the university’s response to the new federal loan limits as it states, “guaranteed $16,000 scholarship for every full-time student in next year’s incoming class…to ensure access to funds they need to cover cost.”7
The following are a few considerations for providing a funding alternative for students: University provides a source of funding in the form of a loan, perhaps leveraging the endowment if it is sufficiently large. Students seek funding from private sector Universities make structural changes to their graduate programs which might include lowering costs, changing admittance qualifications/student make-up, eliminating programs.
The following are a few considerations for providing a funding alternative for students:
- University provides a source of funding in the form of a loan, perhaps leveraging the endowment if it is sufficiently large
- Students seek funding from private sector
- Universities make structural changes to their graduate programs which might include lowering costs, changing admittance qualifications/student make-up, eliminating programs
The following table provides the pros and cons to each of these options.
| Options |
Pros for University |
Cons for University |
University provides loans
(see below for further considerations for this option)
|
• Increases chance of growing the student population by providing a solution unique to the university
• Protects the university from the downsides of changing funding legislation
• Capitalizes on university’s unique positioning to originate loans for their student population
|
• Managing a loan program may be challenging
• Increasing chance of potential financial losses if students default
• Quality of collateral for loan may be lower than desirable
• Requires developing infrastructure and framework for offering a loan program
• Enhances risk perception of “school as a lender”
|
| Student sources loans from private sector |
• Eliminates need for university to build an additional loan program |
• Students may not qualify for private sector loans because of credit rating
• Students may not know how to identify other funding opportunities
• High rates and higher penalties may lead to a more costly solution for borrowers (students)
|