What is The Surplus Paradox?
The average pension plan is now more than 100% funded, yet many sponsors are still evaluating how to safely monetize
surplus. At the same time, organizations continue to fund related benefits from corporate cash, while surplus assets
sit in low‑yield, liability‑hedging portfolios inside the trust. Despite regulatory friction, some organizations
have already used surplus to support other benefit programs and reduce ongoing employer cash spend.
Why it Matters: The Cost of Inefficiency
Strategic redeployment of surplus assets can potentially provide meaningful near‑term liquidity.
An Inefficient Surplus Scenario:
- A sponsor with $50 million in stranded surplus invested in a de‑risked, liability‑hedging portfolio might also
pay $5 million a year for 401(k) matching contributions or active medical premiums from corporate cash.
- Economically, this is equivalent to borrowing at a company’s cost of capital to fund the 401(k) match, while
leaving $50 million invested in corporate bonds (often yielding less than that cost of capital) inside the
trust.
Many surplus redeployment strategies have depended on IRS private letter rulings (PLRs), which have become more
difficult to obtain as certain transactions have been added to the IRS ‘no‑ruling’ list and guidance on Voluntary
Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) redeployments has effectively stalled. Penalties for missteps are also
severe: a direct reversion of surplus pension assets is generally subject to a 50% excise tax on top of corporate
income tax, potentially eroding more than 70% of the asset’s value, and a VEBA reversion can be subject to an excise
tax as high as 100%.
Although this environment has deterred many, some sponsors have moved ahead. For example, some have used pension
surplus to fund other benefits, such as voluntary early retirement programs. Aon has also identified nearly 15
transactions involving retiree medical trusts across large employers in sectors such as utilities, industrials and
telecommunications. Although transactions involving 401(h) accounts did receive PLRs from the IRS, VEBA‑based
transactions generally did not.