Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs), largely dormant since 2022, have revived amid the new U.S.
administration, under which a potentially more business-friendly Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and tariff
uncertainties have caused companies to reconsider IPO plans.
Despite the reemergence of SPAC activity, core litigation risks persist. Directors and officers (D&O) insurance
coverage is therefore essential for businesses going public via a SPAC IPO.
Litigation: The Persistent Shadow Over SPAC Evolution
SPACs flourished in 2021, raising more than $160 billion in capital. However, many post deSPAC companies
underperformed; by late 2023, more than 20 SPAC backed firms had filed for bankruptcy, wiping out an estimated $46
billion in equity value.1 The boom and bust cycle prompted the SEC to adopt new rules imposing heightened
disclosure
and procedural requirements on SPAC IPOs and de SPAC transactions, and helped fuel a wave of shareholder and
government enforcement in D&O actions.
After activity slowed sharply in 2024, the market has begun to rebound. There were 144 SPAC IPOs in 2025, which
raised approximately $30.4 billion, and by early July 2026 there have already been 124 SPAC IPOs, raising about
$24.7 billion and representing roughly 67% of all IPOs so far this year and 17% of total proceeds.2 SPACs
continue to dominate new issue volume, but their prominence has been matched by sustained regulatory and litigation
scrutiny.
Recurring issues, however, like regulatory uncertainty, complex deSPAC litigation and headline-making bankruptcies,
remain significant obstacles for deals.
“SPACs are generally viewed as an easier and cheaper way for a company to go public,” says Adam Furmansky, D&O
Product Leader – East for Aon’s Financial Services Group in the United States. “But, they’re not simply a shortcut
to public capital. SPACs are financial vehicles operating under a spotlight — each step in the process is now more
likely to be scrutinized by the market, and if that scrutiny does not pass muster, tested in the courts.”
What’s Driving SPAC and DeSPAC Litigation Concerns?
SPAC litigation typically falls into three categories:
- SPAC IPO litigation (currently uncommon)
- Litigation challenging the deSPAC transaction
- Post-deSPAC litigation, similar to traditional securities class action stock drop litigation, with claims of
inadequate or inaccurate disclosure, or underperformance
The second and third types are the most common. In addition to underlying litigation, coverage disputes regarding
deSPAC transactions are a potential challenge, with post-transaction claims being particularly complex. Most
post-transaction litigation is filed in federal court and comes with significant defense costs or sizable settlement
amounts that may be in the tens of millions of dollars or higher.