The Total Portfolio Approach – New Innovation or Rebranded Old Ideas?

TPA: Total Portfolio Approach – Innovation or Old Ideas?

The Total Portfolio Approach – New Innovation or Rebranded Old Ideas?

Total Portfolio Approach (TPA): what it is, what it delivers, and what’s achievable within a flexible Strategic Asset Allocation (SSA).

The Total Portfolio Approach has attracted growing attention from large, sophisticated institutional investors and is often positioned as a transformational alternative to traditional SAA—more dynamic, more factor driven, and less constrained by asset class ranges. This paper takes a measured, evidence-based look at what TPA actually changes in practice: where it reflects genuine innovation versus where it largely rebrands long-standing approaches. In this paper, we seek to clarify what TPA implementation looks like in the real world, including similarities and differences from traditional Strategic Asset Allocation approaches.
Key Takeaways
  1. TPA cannot be defined precisely. One of the core challenges to understanding the Total Portfolio Approach is that it is not a monolithic methodology that can be applied off the shelf. While TPA proponents sometimes define it as looking at risk in the total-portfolio context, this doesn’t sufficiently distinguish TPA from other approaches to portfolio management. In practice, “TPA” refers to a range of approaches that are less constrained than traditional Strategic Asset Allocation, often using reference portfolios and factor exposures rather than asset class ranges as the primary risk constraints. The core decision for institutions is how much discretion to delegate to the CIO/OCIO or internal team, under what parameters, and with what oversight and reporting. The teams will then have flexibility to rotate across investments with similar risk factors.
  2. Many perceived benefits can be achieved within a traditional SAA framework. Greater dynamism, better alignment to underlying risk factors, and reduced overdiversification are frequently cited as advantages of TPA. Our analysis suggests these features can—and often are—incorporated into a Strategic Asset Allocation framework by using broad policy categories, wide rebalancing ranges, Opportunity Allocations, and risk management through factor and tracking error lenses. For many institutions, the question is less about adopting a new label and more about evolving existing policies to embed these elements thoughtfully.
  3. What truly changes under TPA is who makes investment decisions and how those decisions are made. Compared with traditional approaches, TPA typically concentrates more authority with CIOs/OCIOs and investment teams and shifts emphasis from holdings-based limits (such as asset class minimums and maximums) toward returns and factor-based risk controls. This can enable a more active implementation, but it also raises important considerations around governance, accountability, transparency, and suitability. Not every institution will have, or want to build the governance capacity and risk tolerance required to fully adopt a TPA-style model.

Assessing TPA: A Practical Guide for Institutional Portfolio Decision Makers

TPA means different things to different people, and in practice, there is a wide range of practices used by proponents of TPA. These “TPA practices” blend new approaches with rebranding of strategies that have been around for decades, many of which are widely used without being described as “TPA” by those doing them. Those looking to understand TPA must realize that it is not a well-defined approach. It is an approach with a high level of delegation to the investment team to implement a highly active investment strategy, and there are many ways institutions implement that under the TPA umbrella.

Aon’s Thought Leader

Eric Friedman, CFA, FSA, EA
Investment Analytics and Strategy Development, Aon Investments USA Inc.

The Total Portfolio Approach is an A La Carte Menu

Article

The Total Portfolio Approach is an A La Carte Menu

Explore Aon’s perspective on the Total Portfolio Approach, highlighting benefits, governance concerns, and practical guidance for institutional investors.

The information, materials and opinions contained in this document, enclosures or attachments are for general information purposes only, are not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice and should not be relied on or treated as a substitute for specific advice relevant to particular circumstances. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of the content of this document and any enclosures or attachments (including, without limitation, any as to the quality, accuracy, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of such content). Unless we provide express prior written consent, no part of this document should be reproduced, distributed or communicated to anyone else and, in providing this document, we do not accept or assume any responsibility or duty of care in respect of this document, enclosures or attachments to any party including a Aon client. Notwithstanding the level of skill and care used in conducting due diligence into any organisation that is the subject of a rating in this document, it is not always possible to detect the negligence, fraud, or other misconduct of the organisation being assessed or any weaknesses in that organisation’s systems and controls or operations.
This document and any due diligence conducted is based upon information available to us at the date of this document and takes no account of subsequent developments. In preparing this document we may have relied upon data supplied to us by third parties (including those that are the subject of due diligence) and therefore no warranty or guarantee of accuracy or completeness is provided. We cannot be held accountable for any error, omission or misrepresentation of any data provided to us by third parties (including those that are the subject of due diligence). This document is not intended by us to form a basis of any decision by any third party to do or omit to do anything.
Any opinions or assumptions in this document have been derived by us through a blend of economic theory, historical analysis and/or other sources. Any opinion or assumption may contain elements of subjective judgement and are not intended to imply, nor should be interpreted as conveying, any form of guarantee or assurance by us of any future performance. Views are derived from our research process and it should be noted in particular that we can not research legal, regulatory, administrative or accounting procedures and accordingly make no warranty and accept no responsibility for consequences arising from relying on this document in this regard.
Calculations may be derived from our proprietary models in use at that time. Models may be based on historical analysis of data and other methodologies and we may have incorporated their subjective judgement to complement such data as is available. It should be noted that models may change over time and they should not be relied upon to capture future uncertainty or events.
THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION OF A FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR FINANCIAL SERVICE IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE, OR TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM, IT WOULD BE UNAUTHORIZED OR UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. Any such prohibited offer or solicitation is void and Aon will disregard any communication received in respect thereof. When distributed in the UK, Aon Investments Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England & Wales No. 4396810. When distributed in the US, Aon Investments USA Inc. (“AIUSA”) is a registered investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). AIUSA is a wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of Aon plc. When distributed in Canada, Aon Solutions Canada Inc. and Aon Investments Canada Inc. (“AIC”) are indirect subsidiaries of Aon plc, a public company trading on the NYSE. Investment advice to Canadian investors is provided through AIC, a portfolio manager, investment fund manager and exempt market dealer registered under applicable Canadian securities laws.

More Like This

More Insights
people