Building Bankable, Resilient Data Centers: From Site to Operation

Building Bankable, Resilient Data Centers: From Site to Operation
March 16, 2026 14 mins

Building Bankable, Resilient Data Centers: From Site to Operation

Risk Management Across the Data Center Lifecycle

Data center spending will reach $6.7 trillion by 2030, according to McKinsey.1 With significant capital on the line, facilities demand a new lifecycle approach to risk that strengthens bankability, protects schedules and delivers operational resilience from day one.

Key Takeaways
  1. Site selection sets the stage for data center project insurability long before construction begins. Early risk alignment and upfront risk engineering are essential to secure resources, capital and enhance insurability — and manage location-specific challenges.
  2. Supply chain bottlenecks, unprecedented speed-to-market demands and talent shortages can trigger construction schedule slippage, liquidated damages and SLA penalties, making disciplined risk transfer critical.
  3. Traditional insurance can fall short in the complex phased construction and ready-for-service digital infrastructure ecosystem, demanding innovative programs and risk strategies led by experienced advisory teams.

Capital is flowing into digital infrastructure at an unprecedented pace — driving a new era of risk that stakeholders must manage across the data center lifecycle.

Propelled by the increasing power density needs of artificial intelligence (AI), campuses and portfolios now routinely reach $10-50 billion in total replacement value, sometimes concentrated at a single site. The race to finance and build these mega‑projects is rewriting the rules of risk transfer: Total insured values often exhaust the capacity of any single insurer — and in some cases, stretch the limits of the traditional insurance market altogether.

Data Center Solutions by Project Size

  • <$1B

    Many Current Market Solutions

  • 1-10B

    Center of Market — Aon’s Data Center Lifecycle Program

  • >10B

    Large, Hyperscale — Bespoke Solutions

As project values rise, stakeholders increasingly require more than traditional insurance. Instead, they need a connected risk strategy that begins before land is acquired, continues through design and construction, and supports reliable long‑term operations. With the right alignment from the outset, projects become more insurable, bankable and resilient — even in the face of extreme weather, grid constraints, supply chain shocks and sometimes complicated phased handovers.

“With most data centers yet to be built, stakeholders have a unique opportunity to set the right foundation from the start — because if essential elements aren’t addressed early, they cannot truly be fixed later,” says Jon Chapman, Aon’s Head of Construction & Infrastructure Industry Specialty, Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

Below, we explore three critical phases where stakeholders can leverage risk management to unlock capital, protect schedules and support long-term operational continuity:

4.8T+

Capital expenditure on data centers is projected to reach $4.8-10.2 trillion by 2030 — with around 50% concentrated in North America.

Source: Aon’s Global Insurance Market Opportunity: Data Centers

7 Constraints in the Data Center Surge

  • 01

    Power Dependency

    Mega-scale data centers consume massive amounts of power due to the rising demands of AI computing hardware. This also affects the local power supply, so many operators are opting to be self‑powered rather than rely on the grid.

  • 02

    Speed to Market

    Developers must secure permits, power, critical equipment, capital and adequate insurance within compressed timelines.

  • 03

    Supply Chain Pressures

    Global manufacturing capacity for generators, switchgear, transformers and even copper wire is now a major constraint. Competition for these components across power infrastructure markets is driving longer lead times and greater delivery risk for data center construction.

  • 04

    Concentrated Value

    Capital deployment for aggregated assets (e.g., owner infrastructure, tenant equipment, digital operations and power sources) requires creative risk structures that reflect how these assets interact and concentrate.

  • 05

    Lender and Investor Demands

    Completed operation full values often exceed the maximum foreseeable loss (MFL) — and lenders can require coverage up to the full value prior to the Final Investment Decision. This creates friction in financing and requires more sophisticated risk modeling.

  • 06

    Sustainability and Regulatory Pressures

    Sustainability targets and regional regulations can add material cost and extend timelines. Access to alternative energy sources, ability to cool facilities in an energy efficient manner and complex permitting regimes are now central considerations in site selection.

  • 07

    Phasing Complexity

    Large campuses require concurrent construction and operations. Insurers must provide limits that cover both phases at once, raising total limit requirements and creating potential gaps if not structured carefully.

Pre‑Construction Phase: Design for Insurability and Bankability at Site Selection

Stakeholder Pressures
Lenders/Investors Owners/Developers OEMs/Tenants
Standardized insurance language, accumulation controls, ESG positioning, political/regulatory stability Power certainty, permits/regulatory acceptance, lender‑ready contract language, clear risk definitions Early SLA feasibility and expectation setting, cyber governance baseline
What good looks like: Governance checklist, standard term map, power strategy (PPA/priority, co‑location risk)

Key Pain Points: Before breaking ground, stakeholders must secure enough project capital and a site with access to critical resources — processes that demand robust risk management. Insurer‑aligned design choices — non‑combustible assemblies, building separation, robust compartmentation, code‑plus suppression, deconcentrated electrical systems and avoiding water above white space — reduce MFL and improve capacity.

1.5x

Building is no longer the most valuable part of a data center project. Graphics processing units, servers and networking hardware now often cost 1.5-2x the infrastructure.

Source: Aon research

Insuring the Uninsurable

Private capital markets, traditional banks and the asset-backed securities market continue to show strong appetite for data center financing — but insurance is now a structural gating issue. Loan documentation often requires insurance limits equal to the full replacement cost or total insured value of collateral. “The global reinsurance and insurance markets cannot deliver limits anywhere near these values for mega-campus developments,” explains Ryan Barber, Aon’s Global Head of Property, Commercial Risk Solutions. “This creates structural tension that increasingly threatens deal execution.”

Service-level agreement (SLA) breaches present another barrier for financiers: Outages can trigger substantial financial penalties even when no physical damage occurs. Bespoke insurance solutions, including parametric SLA penalty cover, can offer limits that align with lender risk appetite and project size, protecting the physical assets underpinning a loan. Stable cash flow also ensures operational continuity, protecting revenue streams and loan repayments.

The MFL-based insurance framework is another solution increasingly accepted by private credit and sophisticated banks. Industry-recognized engineers that specialize in data centers model realistic loss scenarios by fire compartment, power segment and building cluster. Tying insurance limits to the MFL — rather than full project value — aligns protection with actual exposure. Progressive transactions pair MFL‑anchored studies with insurance‑aware loan language (e.g., “commercially available” capacity tests), reducing waiver cycles without compromising credit discipline.

Success Begins from Strategic Site Selection

Site selection sets the trajectory for the entire data center project, shaping access to power, infrastructure, labor, and permitting and regulatory pathways. Getting the location right early dramatically improves project viability — and determines long-term risk exposure.

Site due diligence can involve:

  1. Natural Catastrophe and Climate Hazards: Stakeholders must model the future impacts of both acute (e.g., earthquakes, tropical cyclones) and chronic (e.g., extreme heat, drought) risks.
  2. Power Availability: Delays in securing sufficient power can impact project timelines, financing and insurability.
  3. Access to Renewable Energy: Some developers now co-locate data centers with renewable energy sources like solar, which brings additional due diligence requirements for location assessment.
  4. Water Availability: New data centers put strain on the existing water infrastructure by shifting toward liquid cooling.
  5. Land Acquisition: Clarifying title insurance, mergers and acquisitions exposure and warranty risks helps mitigate legal and financial fallout.
  6. Regulations: Local reforms can influence market access and project feasibility. For example, Singapore’s pause on issuing new data center licenses to manage growth and resource consumption has shifted development to neighboring countries, such as Malaysia and Indonesia.
Quote icon

The real bottleneck is securing the regulatory approvals and permissions that determine who gets access to power and under what conditions. Jurisdiction‑level rules now shape project feasibility far more than the technical ability to produce electricity.

David Mittelholzer
Global Industry Specialty Leader, Natural Resources

Construction Phase: Protect the Schedule and Your Hyperscaler Commitments

Stakeholder Pressures
Contractors/EPCs Owners/Developers Lenders/Investors
Skilled labor scarcity, supply chain lead times, performance security requirements Defect avoidance via upfront engineering, clear risk transfer in contracts Builders risk capacity contingent on quality/controls
What good looks like: Upfront engineering and QA/QC gateways, structured performance security (surety/SDI), supply chain and storage discipline, contractor capability and workforce quality controls.

Key Pain Points: As data center projects multiply, so does competition for materials and people during construction. Missed milestones when critical equipment and skilled labor are unavailable can lead to contractual breaches and financial penalties.

The Supply Chain Squeeze

A multi‑layered supply chain feeds into data center construction — from hard‑to‑secure raw materials to the warehousing, testing and logistics networks keeping projects on track. This complexity increases the probability of disruption. “Critical equipment is customized for each location due to differences in electrical networks and grid characteristics,” says Wee Teck Tea, Head of Commercial Risk Solutions, Aon Singapore. “Replacing these components is not straightforward; obtaining a new transformer can take 9-12 months.”

Material challenges don’t end on arrival. Once in the contractor’s possession, owner-furnished equipment can face warranty risks if improperly stored or exposed to moisture before installation.

Tailored insurance and reinsurance solutions play a crucial role in managing project delays and equipment handling, allowing stakeholders to pursue growth with greater confidence and resilience.

Workforce: Competing for Capability

There is an urgent need for talent with deep expertise in data center construction. Demand for qualified electrical, plumbing and specialty subcontractors continues to outpace supply as the industry booms — an issue that persists after construction.

Competition for experienced personnel in ongoing data center operations and maintenance has led to acute talent shortages in roles like on-site technicians and managing agents. Replacing staff quickly can be challenge with high penalties imposed for unfilled positions. This creates upward pressure on wages and staff turnover, and fierce competition for skilled workers.

Data center stakeholders must carefully manage workforce needs for each phase of the lifecycle and stay competitive to recruit new talent.

Quote icon

Human capital will be a key differentiator in the next wave of data center growth, as power and infrastructure shape where and how capacity can scale. This challenge requires new skills, redesigned roles and stronger employee value propositions across the sector. Talent investments, capabilities supported with AI, and rewards alignment will help attract and retain the future workforce.

Sharon Egilinsky
Partner, Talent Solutions, United States

Construction-to-Operation Phase: Turn Uptime Risk into Balance Sheet Strategy

Stakeholder Pressures
Operators/Tenants Owners/Developers Lenders/Investors 
Grid constraints, rising energy costs, SLA exposures and performance reliability, continuous cyber risk Maintenance economics, capacity ramp-up plans, upgrade cadence without coverage gaps Accumulation management when power assets are integrated/co‑located
What good looks like: Continuous risk engineering, resilience KPIs, SLA‑aligned controls, upgraded governance, clear construction vs. operations handover boundaries, phased delivery and adjacency risk management.

Key Pain Points: The construction‑to‑operation phase is fraught with unique challenges that require thoughtful planning and execution. Strategic risk management can give operators, investors and insurers confidence that a facility will operate reliably and as promised.

Securing the Right Construction-to-Operation Insurance

The availability and practicality of data center insurance shifts in the transition to operations. Risk profiles stabilize once a campus is fully operational, but during construction, capacity is at its most constrained. Asset values escalate quickly, while fire protection, redundancy and other safeguards are still being phased in.

“Lenders could require full-value insurance during the transition to operations,” says Barber. “When those expectations collide with capacity constraints, projects face delays, repeated waiver cycles and unnecessary friction that has little to do with the actual risk on-site.”

Many lending frameworks and rating agency interpretations remain tied to traditional insurance expectations — a tension that’s strained further by the growing prevalence of non‑physical loss exposures. Business interruption and revenue continuity are top lender concerns, yet insurers frequently limit or exclude coverage for cyber‑triggered outages, grid instability and latency‑driven disruption.

Alternative solutions like parametric insurance and captives can fill the gaps left by standard indemnity, while creative approaches — like MFL‑based limits and zoned insurance structures — can better reflect how large, compartmentalized data centers could realistically fail. Where non‑physical triggers (e.g., cyber, grid instability, latency) span towers, coordinate property, cyber and parametric layers to avoid gaps at handover.

Claims Trends at a Glance

  • 114

    total claims reviewed across recent data center portfolios.

    Source: Aon data

  • 25%

    Cyber accounts for 25% of claims, followed by professional indemnity (18%) and property (18%).

  • 25%

    The construction industry accounts for 25% of claims, followed by technology and communications (13%) and real estate (11%).

Managing Adjacency Risks

Construction occurring next to operational data halls governed by strict SLAs heightens liability, risking equipment damage, operational disruption and costly downtime. “Program ambiguity around whether construction-related incidents affecting live loads are project losses or operational outages can expose stakeholders to contractual penalties,” explains Caroline St. Clair, Aon’s Data Center Practice Leader, North America.

Insurance programs and the underlying contracts must be carefully structured to address the transition period, accounting for potential impacts like equipment damage, business interruption or delays in bringing new capacity online — and clarifying who bears responsibility.

Adjacency risks also arise during simultaneous construction of a data center’s core and shell, and its on‑site power generation facilities. Some programs can push the core and shell into traditional contractors all risks insurance/builders risk markets, and the generation assets into energy construction markets. “But without unified coverage, a single major loss affecting both sides can trigger multiple carriers, conflicting policies and inevitable finger‑pointing,” says Brian Hearst, Managing Director of Data Centers and Life Sciences Builders Risk Leader for Aon in North America. Solutions like Aon's Data Center Lifecycle Program can insure both projects under a single form with one lead carrier.

Equip Your Projects for Success in the Data Center Boom

Organizations must pair strong risk management with creative operational strategies to secure sufficient insurance capacity in the fast-moving data center space. Aon’s industry-leading experience in both traditional and alternative risk transfer markets allows teams to deliver solutions that match your needs. The key? Engage risk advisors early in the data center lifecycle.

A proactive approach enables more strategic decision making, reduces the likelihood of delays or operational failures, and ensures that data center projects are set up for long-term success. Find out how we can help on your data center build.

Aon’s Thought Leaders

Paulo André Correia De Novaes
Managing Director of Data Centers, Latin America

Vincent Banton
Head of Construction & Infrastructure, Asia

Ryan Barber
Global Head of Property, Commercial Risk Solutions

Jon Chapman
Head of Construction & Infrastructure Industry Specialty, Europe, the Middle East and Africa

Sharon Egilinsky
Partner, Talent Solutions, United States

Clemens Freitag
Construction & Infrastructure Industry Lead, Latin America

Brian Hearst
Managing Director of Data Centers and Life Sciences Builders Risk Leader for Aon, North America

David Mittelholzer
Global Industry Specialty Leader, Natural Resources

Morgana Multini
Technology, Media and Communication Lead, Latin America

Caroline St. Clair
Data Center Practice Leader, North America

Wee Teck Tea
Head of Commercial Risk Solutions, Aon Singapore

Cecilia Tse
Director, Risk, Climate & Sustainability, Aon Commercial Risk Solutions, Asia Pacific

Molly Tully
Executive Managing Director, Aon Re, United States

General Disclaimer

This document is not intended to address any specific situation or to provide legal, regulatory, financial, or other advice. While care has been taken in the production of this document, Aon does not warrant, represent or guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or fitness for any purpose of the document or any part of it and can accept no liability for any loss incurred in any way by any person who may rely on it. Any recipient shall be responsible for the use to which it puts this document. This document has been compiled using information available to us up to its date of publication and is subject to any qualifications made in the document.

Terms of Use

The contents herein may not be reproduced, reused, reprinted or redistributed without the expressed written consent of Aon, unless otherwise authorized by Aon. To use information contained herein, please write to our team.

More Like This

View All
  • What Multinational Employers Need to Know about GLP-1s

    Article 5 mins

    What Multinational Employers Need to Know About GLP-1s

    GLP-1 medicines for weight loss are increasingly popular in the U.S., prompting employers to consider coverage for employees. While not as common yet globally, GLP-1s spark a broader discussion around using data and analytics to identify health risks and address obesity as a disease.

  • Defensible Casualty Decisions in a Volatile, Data-Heavy World

    Article 5 mins

    Defensible Casualty Decisions in a Volatile, Data-Heavy World

    As casualty volatility increases and financial scrutiny intensifies, risk leaders must do more than structure insurance programs. They must quantify and communicate how limits, retentions and program design align with enterprise risk tolerance and capital strategy.

Subscribe CTA Banner