Organizations are Becoming More Deliberate About Where They Invest
Formal talent identification remains widespread, but the more important story is how employers are using different lenses to determine where reward investment may have the greatest impact.
The latest SITS data shows organizations are identifying priority talent across three groups:
| Question |
Measure |
| Who is delivering exceptional results today? |
Top performers (79%) |
| Which roles are most important to business performance? |
Critical talent/key roles (68%) |
| Who may create future value? |
High potentials (61%) |
These groups answer different workforce questions and should not be treated as interchangeable.
Clear segmentation can help employers distinguish between current performance, business-critical roles and future potential, informing decisions around pay, development, succession planning and retention as workforce requirements change.
According to Aon’s 2026 Human Capital Trends Study, 76% of organizations report that hiring and talent development increasingly prioritize skills and competencies over formal degrees. In the same study, 73% of organizations have deployed or are piloting AI, but only 18% report that most of their workforce has participated in AI reskilling or upskilling programs in the past 12 months.
These findings suggest that skills development is not keeping pace with workforce change. As AI reshapes roles, employers will need to think more carefully about which skills are genuinely business critical, which can be developed internally and which may justify a market premium. Certifications may be relevant in some sectors, particularly professional services, but employers should also assess how employees apply AI to improve productivity, output or business performance. Formal definitions and consistent criteria can help prevent rewarding broad skills-based premiums for credentials that are not genuinely required for a role.
“As skills become more transferable, organizations are competing for talent beyond their traditional industry boundaries. Employers may therefore need to define the relevant talent market by the capabilities they require, rather than by sector alone.” — Martín López, Head of Talent Data & Advisory, Latin America
A skills-based approach can also strengthen the case for wider access to development. Giving employees opportunities to build relevant capabilities can expand internal talent pipelines, support mobility and reduce reliance on scarce external hires, benefiting both the organization and its workforce.