Building Tomorrow’s Grid: Managing Extreme Heat Risk in a Warming World

Building Tomorrow’s Grid: Managing Extreme Heat Risk in a Warming World
March 25, 2026 8 mins

Building Tomorrow’s Grid: Managing Extreme Heat Risk in a Warming World

Building Tomorrow’s Grid: Managing Extreme Heat Risk in a Warming World

Extreme heat from climate change is increasingly threatening U.S. energy supply and reliability – forcing energy companies to take steps to safeguard operations and meet rising demand.

Key Takeaways
  1. Extreme heat from climate change is increasingly threatening U.S. energy supply and reliability, especially for fossil-fuel power plants, as electricity demand rises.
  2. By 2050, billions of dollars in economic value and up to 18% of U.S. generating capacity could be exposed to heat risk.
  3. Energy companies should diversify sources, strengthen infrastructure, and factor climate risk into planning to safeguard operations and meet rising demand.

Rapid growth and investment in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its power-hungry data centers is driving one of the greatest expansions of the U.S. energy grid since its inception in the late 1800s. As new generation facilities come online, energy companies, and the businesses that rely on them, need to understand how climate change will impact these critical resources.

By 2050, about $228B of economic value from the utilities sector in the U.S. will be generated in areas highly exposed to extreme heat, compared to only $16B today1, according to new insight from Aon’s Climate Risk Monitor. The climate analytics tool combines sector-specific vulnerability with forward-looking climate projections to estimate how much power generation is expected to be at risk to various extreme weather events. Fossil-fuel thermoelectric plants are the most at risk, with up to 243 GW or 18% of total generating capacity expected to be at high risk from heat by 2050 (Fig. 1). That is enough electricity to power more than 40 cities the size of New York City during peak demand.

Given the high risk it poses, and the scientific certainty of increasing extreme heat in the future, we take a deeper look at its impact on thermoelectric power generation.

Figure 1: Generating Capacity at High Risk in 2050, by Peril and Fuel Source

The figure illustrates how much power‑generation capacity is expected to face high climate risk, which hazards drive that exposure, and the fuel types most vulnerable.

extreme-heat-and-energy-chart

$228B

Of economic value from the U.S. utilities sector exposed to extreme heat by 2050 according to insight from Aon's Climate Risk Monitor.

Why is Extreme Heat So Important?

Heat impacts both the supply and demand sides of electricity. It reduces generator capacity and transmission efficiency, while simultaneously stressing the demand side as air conditioning use surges. As a result, forced outages and rolling blackouts rise significantly during extreme heat events, compounding health risks to vulnerable populations, and causing a cascade of negative socio-economic impacts. It’s estimated that weather-driven power outages cost the U.S. $20-50 billion annually2.

Thermoelectric power plants that rely on steam to spin a turbine—including both fossil fuel and nuclear sources— account for over 70 percent of total U.S. power generation3 and are especially vulnerable to increasing heat for three key reasons:

  1. Reduced efficiency and capacity – As ambient temperatures climb, turbines lose efficiency, producing less electricity for the same fuel input. It’s estimated that climate change could reduce the average capacity of U.S. thermoelectric plants around 5-15% by 20504.
  2. Increased water needs, reduced supply - Heavy reliance on water for cooling and hotter conditions mean more water is required to prevent overheating, leading to increased costs and lost capacity, which can be further compounded by reduced water supply from the co-occurrence of extreme heat and drought in a warmer climate5.
  3. Curtailments and shutdowns - During periods of extreme heat, some plants are forced to dial back production or shut down altogether to avoid equipment damage or environmental violations tied to water discharge temperatures. Between 2000-2015 in the U.S.6, 43 such instances occurred7, and more than 30 European plants were forced to shut down during the 2003 heatwave alone8.

Measure What Matters

Heat has sweeping impacts, not just across the energy sector, but also across health, agriculture, and construction, among others. Tailoring climate data to sector-specific needs is critical to ensure that risk managers, planners, and regulators can properly assess the relevant impacts of climate change.

Cooling degree days (CDD) is a heat metric of specific relevance to the energy sector. By measuring how much temperatures are above a specific threshold likely needed for air conditioning (usually 65°F), they’re directly proportional to the amount of electricity needed to cool a building. CDD thus serve as a valuable predictor of weather-driven changes in energy demand, with historical fluctuations in summer electricity highly correlated with changes in CDD (Fig. 2).

Figure 2: Relationship of Summer Heat and Electricity Demand

Correlation of summer residential electricity use (per capita) and summer cooling degree days (CDD). Time series is detrended to isolate near-term variability due to weather based on data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration with analysis by Aon.

extreme-heat-and-energy-chart

70%

of total U.S. power generation are especially vulnerable to increasing heat.

Rising Demand in a Warming World

By combining historical CDD data with forward looking projections from Aon’s Climate Risk Monitor, we can estimate climate-driven trends in energy demand across different regions of the U.S. Figure 3 shows the changes in the average CDD per year for each census region, where CDD data is weighted by population for a more accurate measure of how warming temperatures will affect cooling demand.

Rising temperatures will increase air conditioning usage nationwide, extending cooling needs in already hot regions like the West South-Central region, and creating new demand in areas that previously needed little or none, like New England. Increases of 20-50% can be expected by year 2050 under a “moderate” future climate scenario where global warming reaches about 2.0°C by mid-century.

Figure 3: Climate-Driven Trend in Cooling Demand

Projected mid-century changes in population-weighted Cooling Degree Days (CDD) by U.S. Census Division under a “Middle of the Road” SSP2-4.5 climate scenario based on data from U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Census Bureau and Aon’s Climate Risk Monitor.

extreme-heat-and-energy-chart

The negative impacts of extreme heat on thermoelectric power supply and efficiency come just as electricity demand is set to accelerate. At the same time, the exponential growth of AI and data centers is creating a new source of additional demand9. The result is a widening gap: climate change makes it harder for existing plants to produce electricity at levels they previously could, while the nation’s need for electricity is only growing.

Preparing for What’s Next

The U.S. will need to expand energy capacity significantly in the coming decades to meet rising demand. It is critical that climate is considered in this expansion to ensure that the grid can be resilient amid increasing risk from climate change.

The stakes are high. Without planning for extreme heat impacts, the U.S. risks building additional capacity on a shaky foundation – expanding power generation while not accounting for mounting climate risks. However, with proper risk identification, quantification, informed adaptation and strategic investments, the energy sector can navigate climate risk while meeting rising demand.

  1. Diversification is essential – Different energy sources have different vulnerabilities to climate risk. A healthy mix of renewable sources along with thermoelectric generation can help increase grid reliability by reducing the risk to extreme heat.
  2. Increase infrastructure resilience – Infrastructure upgrades are effective measures to adapt to heat events. For thermoelectric power plants, this means investing in advanced cooling technologies and improved water management strategies to maintain reliable output and avoid curtailments.
  3. Integrate climate risk in investments - Integrating climate risk into the investment strategy of large-scale commercial facilities like data centers and power plants can help ensure operational continuity and financial protection, by identifying climate resilient site selection and technologies, and helping to secure more favorable insurance coverage.
Aon’s Thought Leaders
  • Patrick Kelly
    Head of Climate Analytics, Climate Risk Advisory, North America
  • Dave Bigelow
    Assistant Vice President, Aon’s Climate Risk Advisory

General Disclaimer

This document is not intended to address any specific situation or to provide legal, regulatory, financial, or other advice. While care has been taken in the production of this document, Aon does not warrant, represent or guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or fitness for any purpose of the document or any part of it and can accept no liability for any loss incurred in any way by any person who may rely on it. Any recipient shall be responsible for the use to which it puts this document. This document has been compiled using information available to us up to its date of publication and is subject to any qualifications made in the document.

Terms of Use

The contents herein may not be reproduced, reused, reprinted or redistributed without the expressed written consent of Aon, unless otherwise authorized by Aon. To use information contained herein, please write to our team.

More Like This

View All
Subscribe CTA Banner